"But, but, that's just crazy talk!"
I had quite a buildup in mind for my version of the story Ron just posted about Larry and AdWords, because it had such a profound effect on my view of Google at the time. Larry’s unilateral decision not to screen AdWords ads before allowing them to go live on the site convinced me our founders occupied some alternative and severely distorted reality.
How in the world would our brand survive racist, homophobic, pornographic or defamatory ads being allowed to run on Google search results pages? To allow the publication of such ads via Google was a classic marketing crisis in the making. Any fool could see that. Evidently, I was that fool.
In my defense, my background conspired against me. Past public relations debacles had taught me always to evaluate worst-case scenarios before considering the possible benefits of any new initiative. “First, do no harm” had become my mantra.
Working at a newspaper had only reinforced this tendency. Journalists consider their efforts the “first draft of history” and most devote enormous effort to ensuring the accuracy and fairness of what they report. Newspaper staffers suffer even more paranoia on this front than their colleagues in broadcast news, because print produces a physical artifact that cannot be disputed. I found editors, reporters and publishers to be extremely conservative about taking big risks that could expose their brands to charges of unfairness, or worse, inaccuracy.
So, Larry’s idea struck me as lunacy. It took me some time to realize it was actually leadership, but in a form I had not seen before. I knew the flavor of leadership that would not proceed without consensus, and I knew the flavor of leadership that weighed unpopular decisions before cautiously stepping forward to test the waters in some limited fashion. I had not experienced leadership infused with such heartfelt conviction that united opposition was simply brushed aside and the risk fully embraced without fear or hesitation.
AdWords took off and quickly passed the outer moons of Jupiter on its way to some distant galaxy. No P.R. crisis ensued. And I took a notion that maybe I should be more open-minded about big ideas that, on the face of them, seemed ludicrous. I would have many opportunities to test this resolve in the years to come.
How in the world would our brand survive racist, homophobic, pornographic or defamatory ads being allowed to run on Google search results pages? To allow the publication of such ads via Google was a classic marketing crisis in the making. Any fool could see that. Evidently, I was that fool.
In my defense, my background conspired against me. Past public relations debacles had taught me always to evaluate worst-case scenarios before considering the possible benefits of any new initiative. “First, do no harm” had become my mantra.
Working at a newspaper had only reinforced this tendency. Journalists consider their efforts the “first draft of history” and most devote enormous effort to ensuring the accuracy and fairness of what they report. Newspaper staffers suffer even more paranoia on this front than their colleagues in broadcast news, because print produces a physical artifact that cannot be disputed. I found editors, reporters and publishers to be extremely conservative about taking big risks that could expose their brands to charges of unfairness, or worse, inaccuracy.
So, Larry’s idea struck me as lunacy. It took me some time to realize it was actually leadership, but in a form I had not seen before. I knew the flavor of leadership that would not proceed without consensus, and I knew the flavor of leadership that weighed unpopular decisions before cautiously stepping forward to test the waters in some limited fashion. I had not experienced leadership infused with such heartfelt conviction that united opposition was simply brushed aside and the risk fully embraced without fear or hesitation.
AdWords took off and quickly passed the outer moons of Jupiter on its way to some distant galaxy. No P.R. crisis ensued. And I took a notion that maybe I should be more open-minded about big ideas that, on the face of them, seemed ludicrous. I would have many opportunities to test this resolve in the years to come.


26 Comments:
Yeah, I remember the furor over the story about the CIA's role in inner-city L.A.'s crack problem... shame about Mr. Webb's untimely end. :( Still, it's rare you see daring stories like that published in the major newspapers these days (for CYA reasons, among others, I'm sure) -- even the Merc's gotten more conservative, these last few years.
Anyway, as an ex-Googler myself (2003-2004), I've been greatly enjoying this blog, and I look forward to more stories!
"I had not experienced leadership infused with such heartfelt conviction that united opposition was simply brushed aside and the risk fully embraced without fear or hesitation."
This would seem to contradict what Eric Schmidt and Hal Varian say in their recent article about Google:
"Strive to reach consensus. Modern corporate mythology has the unique decision maker as hero. We adhere to the view that the "many are smarter than the few," and solicit a broad base of views before reaching any decision. At Google, the role of the manager is that of an aggregator of viewpoints, not the dictator of decisions. Building a consensus sometimes takes longer, but always produces a more committed team and better decisions."
I'm a new Google employee trying to figure how things work. Care to comment?
Basically, how does Larry's approach (founder with strong ideas can outweigh everyone) fit with Eric's wisdom-of-crowds approach?
Just as long as I can get my handjobs and human remains for a decent price I'm all good.
Great story! Great blog! Who is this Larry? Is he single?
Your friend,
Mz Manners
I have no idea what you are talking about.
Regarding the comment by "doug at google," I think Eric Schmidt's quote is the picture he chooses to present about Google management decision-making. Remember that executives, when quoted publically or speaking publically in front of an audience, will promote the values that they wish the organization to adopt. The words of the executives may not precisely match what actually occurs. So I recommend you take it with a grain of salt.
"I knew the flavor of leadership that would not proceed without consensus, and I knew the flavor of leadership that weighed unpopular decisions before cautiously stepping forward to test the waters in some limited fashion." It that leadership or following the well defined lines?
Puede que todavia no sea un xoogler, pero es raro escuchar de que esta empresa que está creciendo vertiginosamente tenga bastantes inconvenientes acerca de los productos que desea sacar al mercado. La mayoría de estas ya estan en fase beta.
Maybe its not a good english, but i'd like to express my intention to work in google. Its very hard to work in, but I like to know about more this company, from people was working at google.
Don't worry, I understand english, but its to hard for me, write in english...
from paraguay.... jean-claude
Mz Manners: Larry Page, one of the cofounders, inventor of PageRank. He's not married but I think he dates Marissa Mayer, another Googler. Someone else can correct me.
Look, I agree. Cheese is really good, but parmesan is MUCH better.
How in the world would our brand survive racist, homophobic, pornographic or defamatory ads being allowed to run on Google search results pages?
The irony in this should be obvious -
There are homophobic, pornographic or defamatory Organic SERPs (rememeber Jew Watch) so what is the REAL difference.
Of course doing something anonymously and free is One Thing, but paying with a credit card is quite another,
...also, everyone knew that their Ad would eventually be reviewed, and possibly removed!
http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/
http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/
That site is not a google website but is cool. http://www.freewebs.com/pointlessaudio/
Anyway, as an ex-Googler myself (2003-2004), I've been greatly enjoying this blog, and I look forward to more stories!
hey larry
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
There seem to be more than a few short-term ex-Googlers here (people defining their Googler time in terms of 2003-2004, for example).
What led you short-timers to leave the company? Just curious from the pov of someone who's never worked at Google.
- Brian
Hi, I just found out about your blog. Its good, but, for real, What you mean with "Adwords"? Im not a so good English talker. Come and visit my blog. There are some English posts.
Doug raises a good question. My take is that unanimous consensus is rare if not impossible on controversial issues, so some set of individuals needs to be decision makers -- although in a debate-friendly and consensus driven culture, they will actively listen to the relevant data and arguments. Likely Larry was not the lone decision maker, although he proposed a radical strategy. In fact, he probably ultimately had the backing of Sergey and Eric, if not many others.
I wonder whether they fired any Google employee responsible for bad localizations, ever (see http://goolocalizations.blogspot.com for examples)
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Good advice...I'll try to be more open with ideas. I guess my natural skepticism does stop me from doing evil AND good.
I read somewhere that communication is not about ideas but all about feelings. Anyway, not too sure about this but I very much like your writting style!
Not quite sure I find Google to be as economical as many might think.
WHY DO YOU ALL HATE GOOGLE SO MUCH!?!?!? Google is getting up there, whether you like it or not, no, I'm not an ex-Googler!
I've worked in consensus-driven firms, both IBM in the 80's and others more recently, and Google's vibrant, "let the best idea prevail" style of decision making is nothing like the gridlock-prone, slow, plodding, risk-averse cultures of firms that are truly driven by consensus. I look forward to debating that point with Eric and/or Hal next time they're around with some time to chat...
the googlers that left were more than likely contractors that didn't get hired full-time... most people don't leave voluntarily (unless they "cash out")
I remember a guy who left I think it was AdWords on his vesting day. Google was a high pressure place and if you were unhappy you were REALLY UNHAPPY.
Post a Comment
<< Home